Tag Archives: Human Rights

Before Barry takes your guns, consider this:


So there has been another suspicious shooting of some people at an abortion clinic and again, the issue of gun restrictions arises in the US. But before Obama takes your guns, consider this: he, Barry Soetoro AKA Barack Obama, collaborating with Hillary Clinton, has been arming (giving weaponry to) the ‘Syrian rebels’  since at least 2013.

While Obama continues to push the idea of the US being a gun free zone, he is gifting people he calls “rebels” in other countries, with guns, so they can overthrow their government..  That sounds very hypocritical to me.. and I’m sure I’m not the only one who feels that way.

Who else does Barry give guns to?  Well, he gives guns to his agents, the police, the ones who apparently are ‘sworn to protect (and serve) US citizens’, but the police are killing the people they’re sworn to protect at a rate of approximately 3 per day!   And, according to this article,  “Fewer soldiers were killed in war than citizens back home in “the land of the free” in 2014, by a large margin.”


It’s very alarming that government agents can behave exactly as any criminal, murderous gang, but because they wear ‘government approved’ apparel (badges, hats, pants and shirts) with nationalistic symbols on the them, they are ‘legally’ allowed to do so..

Call me idealistic, but a crime is a crime, and a crime cannot be legalized based on what you’re wearing!  The disturbing reality however, is that the US government have basically legalized every crime you can think of, but you can only commit these crimes if you’re wearing your government approved apparel.
So what are the military doing about these criminals ‘in office’?  Well they’re a bit too busy to worry about who they’re taking orders from I guess…


Any moment now, the American People will come to the realization that the US government and it’s agents, the police, and the obedient military  involved in the murdering of innocent people are nothing more than a terrorist organization, just like ISIS, oh wait, sorry for the confusion, ISIS IS  a creation of the very same government! Confusing isn’t it!

Of course, the US government are not the only ones supporting the group they have called ISIS, apparently 40 nations have been funding them. It’s no wonder then that Russia has been attacked for making what seems to be a genuine effort to rid the world of these US bought-and-paid-for mercenaries.

In Australia we have the same problems, criminals in office that do absolutely nothing but enslave and take money from the people they pretend to serve.  And the People are foolish enough to keep voting for them, somehow believing that one is going to be better than the other, and always, sadly, mistaken.

Australians have had their guns taken, and the government’s unlawful activities flourish because they’re some of only people who are armed.  Unlike the American constitution, the Australian constitution is considered to be a joke by anyone in office, and I have experienced this attitude myself in Queensland courts, but then that would be because they have the guns; they don’t even have to accommodate human rights treaties because they have the guns.

For some reason, people look up to these criminals in office.  I cannot for the life of me understand why. I know they use fancy words, are always dressed well, and they seem to be ‘pillars of the community’, the trouble is that they speak in a language that leaves us wondering what they’re talking about because their actions are the opposite to their words.  But why is it that people don’t  see through them, why can’t they see it’s all an act?



Barry Soetoro, AKA Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim, and there’s no point denying it any more,  he bows to ‘king’ Abdullah of Saudi Arabia (while the ‘whitehouse’ deny this there are photos to prove it’s true), he has changed his name as many Muslim ‘converts’ do, and let me add this quote from Barry himself: “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam” (even though he was a paedophile).


Of course,  many people have heard that Barry is a Christian too, but that’s the game he plays, the part of one seeking justice and fairness and he seems so reasonable, but behind the scenes he is a warmonger, a criminal,  our enemy.  (To me it makes no difference what religion he practices, Christians and Muslims are from the same roots, and what some people call ‘horrendous violence’ or radicalism of the Muslims, is the same kind of evil in the Old Testament.)

Obama, and all politicians are just actors for money and power, and they will disarm you just to ensure you’re not a problem for them and their plans. They do not care about your freedom or your safety, in fact, they don’t care for you at all, that’s why they want your guns.

Obama's brother made him proud by becoming a muslim

So while Obama arms the ‘rebels’ in the middle east, and then allows them free access to the US,  he has been attempting to take away the right of bearing arms from Americans.


Gandhi, India and the British Empire


 Gandhi is quoted regarding the disarmament of the Indian People: “Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest.”

Gandhi was truly a peace lover, but it seems he certainly understood that we all have a right to defend ourselves, it would seem too that he understood what the British empire was doing when it disarmed the people. The British ’empire’ is directly responsible for up to 1.8 billion deaths, death by starvation and violence in India alone.

We need to take note of our history, the real history of invasions and control, disarmament and governmental hypocrisy to understand what could come if we do not defend ourselves.

Save the Planet! Smash the system!












An open letter to Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro


Post American worldA friend sent me a link to a video of the man who calls himself ‘president’ Obama, he was speaking to European ‘leaders’ about Russia and the Ukraine.  While I was watching the gut-wrenching hypocrisy in the video several profanities came to mind and I felt like I wanted to vomit. I was surprised however to see that in the video Barack stated: “we welcome criticism”; so after hearing Barack publicly stating that he and his corporation consents to being criticized, I thought I might take this opportunity to flex my natural born, inalienable right to free speech, and express my criticisms of the corporation that is the United States Government, and it’s criminal allies; while attempting to remain as polite as possible.  🙂

(I have downloaded this video, just in case 🙂 )

I will present my criticisms in the form of questions so that Barack has an opportunity to address these questions, if he so chooses.. Of course, in the past it is alleged that Barack chooses to exterminate those who criticize him and his role in a criminal slavery ring rather than answering questions, but considering he is WELCOMING criticism now, I’m sure I won’t end up like Beverly Eckert, the woman, relentless in seeking justice for the victims of the attacks on the Twin Towers, who died just days after a personal visit with Barack…

Not an easy task, but here I go 🙂

Barry, Barack, here are my questions:

Did you enjoy reading the book “The Post American World”?

Isn’t it true that yourself, the corporation you claim to represent as ‘president’, it’s agents and agencies are guilty of many very serious crimes against the People of the United States, including, but not limited to the following:

torture   slavery   genocide   treason   murder   environmental terrorism   human trafficking   fraud   conspiracy to commit war crimes  ?

Isn’t it true that this dishonourable corporation has taken ‘money for promises’ from large corporations that you know will destroy the land and rights of every one of the American People that you claim to obtain your authority from?

Isn’t it true that you are attempting to completely decimate the US economy to destroy the United States from the ‘inside’, resulting in untold damage to the People of the United States?

Isn’t it true that any perceived ‘power’ by means of unethical, unlawful and immoral use of perceived ‘title’ and imagined/fictitious ‘authority’ to commit crimes, being threats of violence and war, planning and implementing acts of financial terrorism, false imprisonment, biological warfare, hi-tech weaponry, purposeful deceptions, unlawful legislations, slavery, theft, manipulations, spying, aiding and abetting paedophiles in ‘public office’, genocide and general horrendous evil, against not only the innocent People of the world, but the People of the United States whom you claim to represent, is by means of your monopoly on weapons, not hesitating to use them on the People of the United States?

Why have you not told the truth to the People that the United States of America is still a British Colony, under alleged ‘crown’ domination?

Can you rebut the claim that you are personally liable for your part in a world-wide slavery ring controlled by the person/corporation claiming to be ‘queen’ whom you have sworn to “remain now and always” a faithful servant to; considering the actual definition of slavery?;

1:  drudgery, toil
2:  submission to a dominating influence
3a :  the state of a person who is a chattel of another   b :  the practice of slaveholding

Did you know that SLAVERY IS A CRIME?

How does your conscience not eat away at you when you consider the crimes against humanity you, personally, have endorsed?

Isn’t it true that every individual of the collective People are free to choose to be governed or not? And if that is true, why do you legislate, fund and promote acts of torture and human rights abuses on those that will not bend to the will of the corporation you claim to represent, in the US and abroad?

Why, considering you claim to have the People’s best interests at heart,  do you not disclose to the people their natural inalienable right to self determination without government?

Isn’t it true that you have misled the People of the United States of America in your oath of office, protecting only the document commonly known as the constitution, but the principles within are not afforded to the People?

Isn’t it true that you have deceived the People into believing that you hold the principles in the ‘Constitution’ for their benefit, when your ‘oath of office’ was only to “preserve, protect and defend the ‘Constitution’ “?

Did you really believe that the people would be content to see the Constitution safely preserved, protected and literally defended in the National Archives while the police and military ignore the ‘Constitution’, breaching human rights treaties and the inalienable rights of Peoples across the world, disarming your own (?) (genuine birth certificate still outstanding) country men and women, in direct violation of the same ‘Constitution’, intentionally and unlawfully criminalizing their every move?

How long do you think it will be before you are arrested and tried for treason? (If you were born in the US)

Isn’t it true that you literally bribed voters to vote for you by giving away to lower income People mobile phones before the election? And then used said phones for the purpose of your corporation’s agencies spying on the people you gave them to?

Why has the corporation of which you claim ‘presidency’, created a ‘provision’ in the “Balanced Budget Amendment” to make an exception for the constitutional rule that “the the state cannot spend more than its income”?   

Were you aware that this amendment was (in good faith) created only for times of war (genuine attack from other nations on ‘home soil),  national emergency, or recession?  Did you realize it was not created for the purpose of cold blooded murder or to hide the criminal incompetency of the corporation?

Isn’t it true that the corporation commonly known as the United States of America uses this provision, spending money that DOES NOT EXIST, to the point where if the people knew of the exact  deficit of the Unites States economy, knowing that they could never, ever pay back what you and your corporation have spent,  you would lose the job they think you have;  if not for your corporation’s created wars?

Can you explain how this provision benefits the living, flesh and blood People who are beneficiaries of the land?  How does this provision offer security to the People when, after years of the corporation failing to not only to balance a budget the corporation claims the People are liable for,  but  also being responsible for the American people losing so many of their loved ones for your fictitious wars?

Isn’t it true that the corporation you work for and it’s franchises invade other countries, by means of lies, deceit and false flags to perpetuate the financial raping of the country; and uses this provision to the greatest extent to do so?

Isn’t it true that the Corporation of the United State’s largest sources of income are nothing more than ‘proceeds of crime’;  stolen assets and energy of the good People of the United States,  and many other vulnerable nations?

Is the above provision the excuse your corporation uses for endless warmongering and genocide and is it the excuse your corporation uses to incur unimaginable debt that can never be repaid,  lift the debt ceiling and use the People of the United States as debt slaves?  (“There is no balanced budget provision in the U.S. Constitution. Thus, the U.S. federal government is not required to have a balanced budget”).

How does it feel to know that literally millions of People worldwide believe that you are so evil that you must be the ‘antichrist’ as described in bible ‘prophecy’? (If you’re not aware of this belief you could google ‘OBAMA THE ANTICHRIST’).  Or does this accusation not bother you because you are a practising Muslim?

How can you possibly excuse the position you and your criminal predecessors, your fellow political degenerate allies such as David Cameron, Tony Abbott, and the people who call themselves ‘royals’ (but have proven to be nothing more than a band of thieves and pirates), and a large portion of your congress justify committing acts of terror on other nations while making the American, Australian and British People a target for retaliation because of your warmongering?

How did you feel when your allegiance to ISIS was revealed,  supplying of weapons and funding to ‘ISIS’ was revealed in mainstream media, and as such are you aware of the penalty for Treason in the United States? “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”  And are you and your agents such as Hilary Clinton prepared for this action against you or will you just change the law so anyone who complains about your TREASON will be killed by your black-ops, off the books and covert assassins?

How on earth can you reason the fact that you have given yourself, your agents and your agencies more rights than the people that you claim gave you authority?

How can conspiracy to murder be an indictable offence for everyone, except you? Why is terrorism wrong when other groups allegedly do it, but your corporation, under your direction order it, conspire to fund it and and then cover it up?

Why have agents of the corporation you represent filed espionage charges against the NSA whistleblower, Edward Snowden, when he was attempting to  reveal the crimes of your corporation against the People of the United States and other nations, to the People of the world? Is your corporation conspiring to pervert the course of justice?

Have you ever considered for one moment that ‘drone’ warfare and depleted uranium used on small countries is the most cowardly, filthy, disgusting, low act, and most of the world think you and those who obey your orders are absolute pieces of shit for allowing and promoting this evil??

Isn’t it true that you believe that ‘fighting for peace’, is a viable argument, no matter how much evidence there is to prove you wrong?

How much longer do you think you’ll be able to pull the wool over the eyes of the People of the United States and the world?

How are you not so very deeply ashamed?

When, Barry, are you going to do the right thing?

Remember now, Barry, you did say you “welcome criticism”, so play nicely, a lot of people would miss me…

You’re welcome

Save the Planet! Smash the system!



“The People are the ultimate source of legitimacy of all law”


terra nullis nakba

“The search is on for a new fundamental basis of the legitimacy of Australian laws” … ‘Justice’ Michael Kirby.

I assert that the Australian government, it’s agents and it’s agencies have no right at all to govern any people without their individual written consent, with full disclosure and all terms clearly laid out, as in all lawfully binding contracts. This country was not ‘settled’ lawfully, with consent, agreement or contract, but by vicious and brutal force, murder and slavery. The Crown’s invasion of this country was under the pretense that it was not occupied, and as that fraud has been unequivocally established, it is fact that the government currently claiming authority over the Australian people have no authority whatsoever over those that did not consent, in essence, they are an occupying force, employing traitors, against the Australian people.
The federal constitution, written in 1900, explicitly stated that Aboriginals would not be counted in any state or federal census, does this government wish to further denigrate our Native Tribal Peoples by forcing them to be subject to whatever fairy tale the ‘Constitution’ represents?

What is the ‘Crown’

Elizabeth Mountbatten/Battenberg commonly referred to as ‘Queen Elizabeth II, is the ‘legal’ and political entity known as the Crown. In ‘legal’ terms the ‘Crown’ is a ‘Corporation Sole’.  A corporation sole is a legal entity consisting of a single (“sole”) incorporated office, occupied by a single (“sole”) person.  A corporation sole allows corporations (often religious corporations or Commonwealth governments) to pass without interval in time from one office holder to the next successor-in-office, giving the positions ‘legal’ continuity in terms of subsequent office holders having identical powers to their predecessors. A corporation is defined as a large company or group of companies acting as a single company.

The concept of the ‘Crown’ was created under the feudal system, a combination of legal and military customs in medieval Europe, broadly defined, it was a way of structuring society around relationships derived from the holding of land in exchange for labour.

Feud: a prolonged and bitter quarrel or dispute.

In England all rights and privileges were ultimately bestowed by the ‘ruler’.  Land was ‘granted’ by the ‘Crown’ to lords in exchange for feudal services and they, in turn, ‘granted’ the land to lesser lords leaving the less fortunate no choice but to be the slaves of the ‘Crown’ for the privilege of having somewhere to live, which until this system emerged was the right of all.
The Crown corporation spread it’s darkness to many lands, and all natives from these lands tell the same story of evil that the Original Tribal People of Australia tell. The ‘Crown’s’ brutal ‘reign’ explains why there is still so much inequality in our country, Australia, a subservient colony or ‘vassal’ of the British Crown, a corporation, “living in a prolonged and bitter dispute”, in a modern day ‘feudal system’.

I, personally, utterly reject all proposals and claims to authority made by this criminal corporation and consider that these last few centuries, in the future, will be counted as one of our darkest historical times, if we survive the political, environmental and industrial stupidity that has destroyed so much of the most sacred and ancient of landscapes and culture.

Genocide and slavery

Over 200 years ago this beautiful land, our home, had been a nation of approximately 500 native tribes using 700 different dialects in what we may now think of as communities, all having their own customs and cultures, and their own hereditary lands, living in complete harmony with their environment. There were no jails, no police, no guns, and no government, and the Native people thrived.
After the invasion, as of 1788, Australia was regarded by the British as a colony of ‘settlement’, not of conquest because the Natives were not considered to be human by the ‘Crown’. Native lands were over-run by British colonists on the premise that the land belonged to no-one (‘terra nullius’). Clearly this was an incorrect and certainly fraudulent report.

The Native Peoples were not given a choice, the invaders demanded compliance with astonishing violence, claiming for themselves and their ‘lords’ what was the spiritual, inherited home of these Native Peoples for untold thousands of years previously. The Natives were massacred, taken as slaves for labour and the women as sex slaves, their children stolen from their parents by government agents, their water and food supplies poisoned with arsenic and strychnine, all at the behest of the ‘Crown’.

crown slaveryindex  more slaverystolen children

After the invasion the land was colonised by convicts, often skilled in their trades, those skills were used to build infrastructure for the ‘Crown’, alongside the Native Originals who had been kidnapped for the same purpose, slavery.  Compulsorily taken from their homeland for convictions over very trivial crimes that very often had been the result of the desperate poverty of England at the time, and sentenced to be extradited to this already occupied land, these unfortunate individuals had been severely punished, essentially, for their poverty, and clearly used as slaves for the term of their ‘Crown’ imposed incarceration.

In 1873 the English novelist Anthony Trollope visited Australia, and the devastation of the Tribal Peoples, to him, was most evident. “There has been some rough work”, he wrote: “We have taken away their land, have destroyed their food, made them subject to our laws, which are antagonistic to their habits and traditions, have endeavoured to make them subject to our tastes, which they hate, have massacred them when they defended themselves and their possessions after their own fashion, and have taught them by hard warfare to acknowledge us to be their master”. Most certainly when the author said “we”, he was referring to the English.

More Crown injustice

Without their consent, Original Tribal Australians were considered to be ‘wards of the state’ until, by referendum, the ‘white’ population voted on allowing voting or citizenship ‘rights’ to the Tribal Peoples in the 1960’s. But, still, Queensland natives were forced to live on reserves until 1971, and were not able to own property until 1975.
The first law in Western Australia to officially sanction the removal of children was the Industrial Schools Act of 1874. It stated that, ‘any Indigenous child “surrendered” to an institution could be detained there without parental consent, or contracted to employment after the age of 12 until the child reached 21 years.
Tribal People were removed from their traditional lands for British government between 1953 and 1957 to detonate nine atomic bombs and carry out 700 “minor trials” at Marilinga, Monte Bello Island and Emu Field in Central Australia. The fallout extended over a wide area. These tests left 120 square kilometres of traditional land permanently contaminated and causing many Indigenous people to sufferer the disastrous effects of radiation following these tests for generations to come.

Australia is a crime scene

Dr Rosalind Kidd is an historian, author and specialist in Original Peoples  affairs. She says from the late 1800s to the early 1900s, colonial and then state governments contracted out Aboriginal men, women and children to work. ‘The government saw they were a very useful workforce and the government needed the pastoral industry to succeed. White people would not go there and do the work and there were whole groups of Aboriginal people out there; they brought them under control to work anywhere in the state and with no real protection. It became such an advantage for state governments to do this that they continued to do it.’ According to Dr Kidd, the schemes only ended in 1970. ‘Boys were generally sent to work on pastoral properties, while girls worked as domestic servants. They were given no protection and were often exposed to both physical and sexual abuse. Floggings were common, and police would find runaways and send them to Palm Island as punishment.’

Cruelly, voting was made compulsory for the Tribal Original Peoples in 1983, forcing them to choose a master from a predetermined list of white men who were clearly unaware and uneducated in the ways of their historical Tribal predecessors or the balance of the living environment,  leaving them further enslaved to the occupying regime, and the will of the most ignorant of men.
The Australian government has not evolved since these horrendous crimes committed by our British forefathers and that is because it operates on the same system; money before people.
Children are still being taken from their parents, people are still held in prisons for victimless ‘crimes’, and governments continue to pass legislation, acts and statutes that continually disadvantage those most vulnerable; without lawful authority.
The ‘justice’ system is a farce based on trickery and implied consent, deviously concealing the fact that the ‘Crown’ have discontinued our inalienable right as people to be recognised as ‘Natural Humans’ and are now, in the narrow sight of the ‘Crown’, only considered to be ‘legal persons’, virtual corporations that have no human rights, via our ‘birth certificates’, or ‘bondage certificates’.
‘Star Chambers’, once abolished due to the unjust process, are employed today by the ‘Crown’ and it’s henchmen and considered by these criminals as ‘justice’.
The electoral procedure employed is a legal trap by a corporation to continue the slavery, an implied agreement, without full disclosure, based on unlawful legislation making it an offence payable to not agree to be governed.
Local governments have no authority, the Australian people choosing to not allow them authority, via referenda, twice, and yet if council rates are not paid home owners have their homes taken from them by force by government agents.
The Australian government has supported and financed terrorism plots against many countries, including Iraq and Syria, colluding with the British and US governments, killing and maiming many thousands.  ‘Income tax’ is demanded with the threat of incarceration, property acquisition, violence and financial hardship, forcing innocent Australian citizens to pay for governmental crimes.
Slavery, murder, child abuse, violence and usury is rife in Australia’s political history, and it flourishes under government legislation today. Clearly, the sole reason for the assumed authority of the Australian government, is the legalisation of it’s own crimes and it’s monopoly on weapons.


Without contracts, agreements and consent we are left with thuggery

The foundation of legal relations is a ‘contract’, an agreement of the parties. In order for an agreement to be a contract (or a variation of an existing contract) it must be supported by consideration and full disclosure; (the “whole truth” about any matter which the other party should know in deciding to contract). The agreement must also be sufficiently certain and complete to be enforced, and the parties must have intended their agreement to be a contract. The absence of any of these elements will signify either that there is, in law, no agreement or that the agreement is not enforceable as a contract.

The most important decision a person could make is whether or not, he or she would employ the services of someone to ‘take care of their affairs’, to represent them or to govern them. As proof of this fact I would like to point out that there are contractual agreements in law that are sighted and witnessed regarding Enduring Power of Attorney agreements and similar positions of ‘representation’, such as an Executor.  The fact that the Australian government, it’s agencies and sub-corporations do not have written consent from individuals and Peoples to govern them means there is no contract, no proof at all of authority, which is why ‘judges’ and ‘magistrates’ run out of court room when asked for their proof of authority.

It is every natural human being’s right to agree or not to agree to such contracts, and without consent from Australians as individuals there cannot be a government who claims to govern all. Decisions can not be made for us by governments that did not have our consent via written or verbal contract to begin with, and most certainly can not be lawfully enforced through property acquisition, violence or imprisonment.

I again quote Justice Michael Kirby; “..it may be said that they, the people, are the ultimate source of legitimacy of all law in Australia.”  Justice Kirby was correct, the law must come from the people, for the benefit of the people and their home, and if the people, individually do not wish to contract there is no lawful basis for governance or the legislation thereof.

Clearly, the Original Tribal Peoples did not consent to a British governance, they did not, in fact, consent to be governed at all.  Our Tribal Peoples are victims of horrendous crimes, the crimes of the Crown corporation and it’s agents, historically and presently.

As Australians we must be vigilant not to allow invasion, genocide and slavery to be considered a legitimate basis of governance lest we further, as a nation, become victims of these draconian beliefs. We must acknowledge and protect the individual’s natural born rights, choices and freedoms and investigate the crimes of those who would be traitors to the Australian Peoples, and enemies of the Original Tribes.

Not only is it unlawful for a corporation, even if it is masquerading as a government, to make decisions for people without their written consent, especially those that have had their lands, culture and families taken from them by that same corporation, but it is unjust!
I reject the ‘Crown’s’ corporation/s, it’s agents and agencies’ assumption of authority over me.
I reject their claim of authority to makes laws, acts and statues that deprive myself, and others of what are inalienable rights.
I reject it’s titles, I reject it’s acts of terrorism against the Australian people and it’s victims abroad.
I will not condone the ‘Crown’s’ crimes against humanity, and I will not serve the enemy of my People.
I reject the constitution as I did not sign a contract giving the Australian constitution authority foregoing my inalienable rights.
I will not vote for a slave master, a lord or a ‘queen’.
I reject the ‘Crowns’ claim of ownership over Australia, it’s land, it’s assets and it’s People, and assert that the ‘Crown’ is a gang of thieves and tyrants, now and historically, unlawfully using our birth certificates as certificates of ownership.
The Original Tribal Australians are a free people, they are the guardians of this land. They left no gaping holes in this land, did not poison waterways and left no ‘carbon footprints’. White man could have learned so much, but chose, rather, to live in constant feud and ignorance. The most important aspect of our life here on this planet is compassion, but the ‘Crown’ is a psychotic Corporation that will not stop until it devours all.

The ‘Crown’s’ illegitimacy has been unveiled, and with it all of it’s crimes. Will the government prosecute that which it swears allegiance to? Of course not, the ‘Crown’ is it’s master, the ‘Crown’ is the government, so these most horrendous crimes go, not only unpunished to this day, but celebrated by ignorant politicians and ‘blind’ servants of the ‘Crown’.
With regard to the compulsory inclusion of Original Tribal Australians in the ‘constitution’; in the absence of a lawfully binding contract from every individual Natural human, it must be known that there is no implied consent, there is simply ”no contract”. Anything less than consent is an act of war.

Save the Planet, Smash the system!