Category Archives: Crimes of the Crown

Satanic ritual abuse survivors speak out


Satanic ritual abuse is not a myth.  It is tied not only to low-lifes in drug rings, but to politicians, to perverted wealthy celebrities, doctors, police and the injustice system that protects it.

Children that are kept in these rings are not only sexually abused but are forced to abuse and kill other children.

I’m sure you’ve asked yourself how ‘judges’ can allow paedophiles to walk out of court without even a slap on the wrist for raping children, but the job of the injustice system is to protect it’s masters.

Governments and media around the world have attempted to dismiss testimony of individual’s first hand accounts of Satanic ritual abuse, however more and more accounts are coming to the fore.  How long can this evil be ignored?

These paedophile rings use code words and symbolism to communicate to each other their preferences in children.

You can learn more by researching ‘Pizzagate’, ‘Pedogate’, Fiona Barnett and by checking this link:

Please watch the videos below.  These videos were removed by YouTube, obviously in an effort to hide the truth, but can now be viewed here:

Save the Planet, Smash the system!



The illusion of the social contract



I saw this morning, an article in mainstream news that Santos was ‘wanted’ in his own country, being the centre of a controversy that involved him speaking the truth about the state of ‘law’ in this country and many others, and exposing the illegitimacy of the courts and the government. Apparently, according to this damning report, he also likes to swear a lot. 🙂 He named the individuals involved in the fraud publicly and must have frightened the crown officers terribly when he released their information.. (poor little wigs) Well, in my mind, isn’t that what the courts and media do to everyone except the ‘judiciary’? For example, in my experiences with the courts and media they do not respect your privacy and they do not respect the fact that you have rights. My full name, and town were published, I was slandered, and manhandled, nearly suffocated, police watched me pee for 7 days and harassing and demanding letters from the courts were continuing.  What is so very clear is that the people who call themselves judges, in this country especially, are now finding themselves trapped in their own web of lies and deceit, traitors against humanity. They are scared, and it is obvious.

It seemed the media liked to associate Santos with “drug traffickers”, but by the sound of it the two men mentioned in the article were actually growing herbs. Yes, cannabis is considered by botanists to be an annual, dioecious, (a characteristic of a species, meaning that it has distinct male and female individual organisms or colonies, meaning that a colony contains only either male or female individuals) flowering herb.  But “drugs trafficking” sounds so much more sinister than florist or herbalist, doesn’t it.

The article was interesting because it showed the courts are now being used almost entirely to service the ‘crown’, the ‘judiciary’ and police, and the Australian people not sworn to the ‘crown’ are treated like vermin. There is no justice in Australia, we are under occupation.

Now, just so you know, the ‘judiciary’ have no legitimate authority at all, and are consciously aware of what they are doing. When you ask them for their proof of authority they run out of court, all of them do it, including family court ‘judges’.
So how can the ‘supreme court’ justify a charge of contempt of court on Santos when, and I quote this government website.
“ Rationale for Contempt of Court ….
Fundamentally, contempt of court is an interference with the administration of justice. In Re Colina; Ex parte Torney (1999) 166 ALR 545 at 579, Hayne J of the High Court of Australia identified ‘the cardinal feature of the power to punish for contempt’ as being an exercise of judicial power by the courts ‘to protect the due administration of justice’. The doctrine of contempt of court is not directed to protecting the personal reputations of judges: Theophanous v Herald and Weekly Times (1993–4) 182 CLR 104 at 187. Offensive remarks about a judge, which do not interfere with the administration of justice, may give rise to liability in defamation but do not constitute contempt of court”.
This part, ”to protect the due administration of justice” is most important, because what Santos was doing was pointing out the injustice, the unlawfulness of what these ‘judges’ were doing.  The ‘supreme court’ are overstepping their own ‘legal’ standards, and proving to the Australian people that they believe that we are NOT “equal under law”. How can freedom of speech be deemed criminal? Why is that the accuser of victimless ‘offences’, REGINA, ‘queen’, ‘crown’, is the person/corporation, the police and ‘judiciary’ swear an oath to? Doesn’t sound like they’re on our side does it? They are not.

The ‘crown’ is the same brutal regime that invaded this country, enslaved and murdered the innocent native Originals and dragged their own countrymen and women across the ocean to this rugged land, against their will, to further expand the ‘crown’s’ evil empire. Supporters of this regime infest government agencies today, and include people that pretend to be public servants, such as the ‘judiciary’, police and politicians, but they are, in fact, traitors.  As John Adams once stated “The happiness of society is the end of government.”

Recently in the Queensland news, it was reported that ‘Justice’ Wilson, was upset by ‘chief justice’ Tim Carmody’s attack on the ‘judiciary’, and, stated in this article that Carmody “…referred to us collectively as snakes and scum. Both the remarks and that kind of hypocrisy have a devastating effect upon morale.”

Now, when I look at the scenario these two ‘justices’ have laid before the Queensland people, besides the fact they have no respect, no discretion, and no honour, this is what I see: Wilson does not rebut Carmody, his ‘superior’s’ claim, the claim that ‘justices’, ‘judges’ and ‘magistrate’s’ are “scum and snakes”, but rather, called him a hypocrite. When you think about that, and when you know the basis of ‘truth’ is undisputed claim, and when you know THEY, the ‘legal’ big WIGS know that, you now have a public admission.

There are some of us out there that don’t see the court for what it is, they think they are going to get ‘justice’, and they believe the people in the black robes are put in place for the purpose of helping society.. and some even believe that because people get dressed up in wigs and black robes and don’t swear in public that they must be good people… Wolves in sheep’s clothing… notice the wig! I see the truth of what they are because I have experienced their lack of integrity and disgusting lack of humanity first hand.

I was forced to sign a document by the court by means of threat, so my only choice was to intentionally write next to my signature, “under protest and duress”, making it clear I was coerced and threatened into signing, which is unlawful. After I was arrested and locked in the watch-house all night ‘magistrate’ John Hodgins of Maroochydore said to me in a quiet little star chamber on a Saturday morning, (where clerks and lawyers turn up in football jerseys and jeans), when I pointed out the document signed under duress and therefore was not lawful, he said, “That’s too bad, you still signed it”.

‘Magistrate’ Bernadette Callaghan, of Maroochydore court sent me to prison for 2 weeks for what they call a ‘breach of bail’, when I was not on bail at all. She told me I had to stay in jail until they found the signed bail form and because they couldn’t find the bail paperwork, she was forced to call me back to court and release me after one night in a women’s prison.  Callaghan did not follow through on the ‘breach of bail’ charge, of course.                        
Before agreeing to the position of ‘magistrate’, Bernadette Callaghan was working with a group called Sisters Inside, a group supporting women in prison, victims of the system. How things change….

I have seen a ‘magistrate’ in Ipswich Queensland throw an accused man out of court for asking 3 times if he will retain his inalienable rights if he enters the dock, the police held him down and beat him while his name was called over the loud speaker in the court house. The ‘magistrate’ charged him for not appearing! And they held him in the watch-house for hours.

I have seen Queensland ‘magistrate’ Athol Kennedy order the arrest of a young man in a Cleveland courtroom, on the day of his government issued invitation, for not appearing in court, when the young man was standing in front of him. You may have to read that again to see exactly what it is I’m saying.. Judges lie!!! They don’t know what to do when their authority is in question so they lie, and they cheat and they run… That same day, Athol Kennedy told the police to erase the memory card on my camera because I had the evidence of his crimes, but the police, one of them being “S/C Robert Johnstone 4011636, of Cleveland police station” stole my camera, he said I could have it back when I told them my name.

Stephen Coats, family court ‘judge’, when asked for his proof of authority walked out, and did not ever supply proof, but did make an unauthorised and unlawful ‘judgement’, leaving me without my 2 children, despite 7 glowing letters of recommendation regarding my parenting.

‘Magistrate’ Annette Hennessy of Maroochydore court house eventually refused me entry into my own court case because I asked for her proof of authority over me, and every time I did she bowed and left the court room. If I had been able to attend the result of the last session would have left Hennessy facing charges for impersonating a public servant! Not unusually, every one of the police involved perjured themselves and then the court claimed I owed them $800, even though I had been imprisoned a total of 7 days and not one of the ‘magistrates’ were able to actually show me proof of authority! Hennessy rejected my affidavit, and I quote this article
“She [meaning me 🙂 ] refused to stand up in recognition of Magistrate Annette Hennessy, would not enter a plea to her charges and demanded to table as evidence a 22-page affidavit suggesting the government was a terrorist organisation, that police were “hired thugs”, and that the courts had no legitimate authority.” “Ms Hennessey later examined the affidavit, which included claims of an illegal search of her house and human rights violations, but it was rejected as irrelevant.” So, the truth was not rebutted, they could not rebut it, therefore it stands as truth; the government is a terrorist organisation, police are “hired thugs”, and the courts have no legitimate authority! And when did human rights violations become irrelevant?

All the experiences I’ve had with the unlawful courts in Queensland Australia are available apparently, in transcripts and sound files (though a private corporation that the government hires demands money for these records).

I have heard all manner of bullshit and rottenness come from the mouths of ‘magistrate’s’ and ‘judges’, and I have seen them breach all manner of their own ‘legal’ standards.  I have seen ‘magistrates’ babble on about “legal gobbledegook” and “legal nonsense” when you assert your inalienable rights, I’ve heard them say that both the Magna Carta and constitution is irrelevant, and I have seen them refuse to answer the question of who it is that they swear an oath to.  Is it possible that Tim Carmody is correct, that the ‘judicial’ system is comprised of “snakes and scum”? Yes, and it is also most certain, that he is, in fact, a hypocrite, unless he resigns.

Santos Bonacci made the point that the courts had no authority over the living man, and he is absolutely correct. The courts have no lawful authority, they work for a foreign corporation that is posing as government. Their job is to keep the Australian public from turning on the occupiers, their employer.  They keep the money flowing in for trivial and unlawful legislations, and jail and enslave as many as they can for profit, many of those held in prison were refused a trial by jury!

What does the supreme court say about our inalienable right to free speech? Why is it that the media can slander and print what they want about some individuals, with the blessings of the courts, and yet the ‘judiciary’ feel they are not subject to the same principles of freedom of speech? Or perhaps the Supreme Court is being used by judges to protect their ‘own’? But are we not all “equal under law”?

Based on the above government website, the ‘supreme court’ has just proved it is as illegitimate as the rest of the legal-house-of-cards, using their ‘office’ to protect themselves while denying another his inalienable rights.  “Offensive remarks about a judge, which do not interfere with the administration of justice, may give rise to liability in defamation but do not constitute contempt of court.”  In my opinion, the action of the ‘supreme court’ and the ‘attorney general’ against Santos requires us all to think deeply about what it is the government is really up to. They collude with dangerous gangs to imprison their own countrymen and pay these corporate uniforms, calling it ‘law’.
But, it is not lawful for private corporations to have the power, in what should be the People’s courts, to send Australians to debt prison.  It is not lawful for the government to sell off the collective assets of the people to private corporations who then force Australians to pay for what is inherently theirs.
And it is not lawful for a corporation to force, by threat of violence, imprisonment or asset confiscation, obedience or payment without a lawfully binding contract, and Santos did not sign a contract.

Santos is quite a controversial character, his passion always attracts attention, so of course a man like that scares the little wigs, and really, they should worry.  They are traitors against humanity, they know it, and we know it.

I leave you with this great little clip, Trying to control the world? We do not consent! By Rob  Menard

Save the Planet, Smash the system!

“The People are the ultimate source of legitimacy of all law”


terra nullis nakba

“The search is on for a new fundamental basis of the legitimacy of Australian laws” … ‘Justice’ Michael Kirby.

I assert that the Australian government, it’s agents and it’s agencies have no right at all to govern any people without their individual written consent, with full disclosure and all terms clearly laid out, as in all lawfully binding contracts. This country was not ‘settled’ lawfully, with consent, agreement or contract, but by vicious and brutal force, murder and slavery. The Crown’s invasion of this country was under the pretense that it was not occupied, and as that fraud has been unequivocally established, it is fact that the government currently claiming authority over the Australian people have no authority whatsoever over those that did not consent, in essence, they are an occupying force, employing traitors, against the Australian people.
The federal constitution, written in 1900, explicitly stated that Aboriginals would not be counted in any state or federal census, does this government wish to further denigrate our Native Tribal Peoples by forcing them to be subject to whatever fairy tale the ‘Constitution’ represents?

What is the ‘Crown’

Elizabeth Mountbatten/Battenberg commonly referred to as ‘Queen Elizabeth II, is the ‘legal’ and political entity known as the Crown. In ‘legal’ terms the ‘Crown’ is a ‘Corporation Sole’.  A corporation sole is a legal entity consisting of a single (“sole”) incorporated office, occupied by a single (“sole”) person.  A corporation sole allows corporations (often religious corporations or Commonwealth governments) to pass without interval in time from one office holder to the next successor-in-office, giving the positions ‘legal’ continuity in terms of subsequent office holders having identical powers to their predecessors. A corporation is defined as a large company or group of companies acting as a single company.

The concept of the ‘Crown’ was created under the feudal system, a combination of legal and military customs in medieval Europe, broadly defined, it was a way of structuring society around relationships derived from the holding of land in exchange for labour.

Feud: a prolonged and bitter quarrel or dispute.

In England all rights and privileges were ultimately bestowed by the ‘ruler’.  Land was ‘granted’ by the ‘Crown’ to lords in exchange for feudal services and they, in turn, ‘granted’ the land to lesser lords leaving the less fortunate no choice but to be the slaves of the ‘Crown’ for the privilege of having somewhere to live, which until this system emerged was the right of all.
The Crown corporation spread it’s darkness to many lands, and all natives from these lands tell the same story of evil that the Original Tribal People of Australia tell. The ‘Crown’s’ brutal ‘reign’ explains why there is still so much inequality in our country, Australia, a subservient colony or ‘vassal’ of the British Crown, a corporation, “living in a prolonged and bitter dispute”, in a modern day ‘feudal system’.

I, personally, utterly reject all proposals and claims to authority made by this criminal corporation and consider that these last few centuries, in the future, will be counted as one of our darkest historical times, if we survive the political, environmental and industrial stupidity that has destroyed so much of the most sacred and ancient of landscapes and culture.

Genocide and slavery

Over 200 years ago this beautiful land, our home, had been a nation of approximately 500 native tribes using 700 different dialects in what we may now think of as communities, all having their own customs and cultures, and their own hereditary lands, living in complete harmony with their environment. There were no jails, no police, no guns, and no government, and the Native people thrived.
After the invasion, as of 1788, Australia was regarded by the British as a colony of ‘settlement’, not of conquest because the Natives were not considered to be human by the ‘Crown’. Native lands were over-run by British colonists on the premise that the land belonged to no-one (‘terra nullius’). Clearly this was an incorrect and certainly fraudulent report.

The Native Peoples were not given a choice, the invaders demanded compliance with astonishing violence, claiming for themselves and their ‘lords’ what was the spiritual, inherited home of these Native Peoples for untold thousands of years previously. The Natives were massacred, taken as slaves for labour and the women as sex slaves, their children stolen from their parents by government agents, their water and food supplies poisoned with arsenic and strychnine, all at the behest of the ‘Crown’.

crown slaveryindex  more slaverystolen children

After the invasion the land was colonised by convicts, often skilled in their trades, those skills were used to build infrastructure for the ‘Crown’, alongside the Native Originals who had been kidnapped for the same purpose, slavery.  Compulsorily taken from their homeland for convictions over very trivial crimes that very often had been the result of the desperate poverty of England at the time, and sentenced to be extradited to this already occupied land, these unfortunate individuals had been severely punished, essentially, for their poverty, and clearly used as slaves for the term of their ‘Crown’ imposed incarceration.

In 1873 the English novelist Anthony Trollope visited Australia, and the devastation of the Tribal Peoples, to him, was most evident. “There has been some rough work”, he wrote: “We have taken away their land, have destroyed their food, made them subject to our laws, which are antagonistic to their habits and traditions, have endeavoured to make them subject to our tastes, which they hate, have massacred them when they defended themselves and their possessions after their own fashion, and have taught them by hard warfare to acknowledge us to be their master”. Most certainly when the author said “we”, he was referring to the English.

More Crown injustice

Without their consent, Original Tribal Australians were considered to be ‘wards of the state’ until, by referendum, the ‘white’ population voted on allowing voting or citizenship ‘rights’ to the Tribal Peoples in the 1960’s. But, still, Queensland natives were forced to live on reserves until 1971, and were not able to own property until 1975.
The first law in Western Australia to officially sanction the removal of children was the Industrial Schools Act of 1874. It stated that, ‘any Indigenous child “surrendered” to an institution could be detained there without parental consent, or contracted to employment after the age of 12 until the child reached 21 years.
Tribal People were removed from their traditional lands for British government between 1953 and 1957 to detonate nine atomic bombs and carry out 700 “minor trials” at Marilinga, Monte Bello Island and Emu Field in Central Australia. The fallout extended over a wide area. These tests left 120 square kilometres of traditional land permanently contaminated and causing many Indigenous people to sufferer the disastrous effects of radiation following these tests for generations to come.

Australia is a crime scene

Dr Rosalind Kidd is an historian, author and specialist in Original Peoples  affairs. She says from the late 1800s to the early 1900s, colonial and then state governments contracted out Aboriginal men, women and children to work. ‘The government saw they were a very useful workforce and the government needed the pastoral industry to succeed. White people would not go there and do the work and there were whole groups of Aboriginal people out there; they brought them under control to work anywhere in the state and with no real protection. It became such an advantage for state governments to do this that they continued to do it.’ According to Dr Kidd, the schemes only ended in 1970. ‘Boys were generally sent to work on pastoral properties, while girls worked as domestic servants. They were given no protection and were often exposed to both physical and sexual abuse. Floggings were common, and police would find runaways and send them to Palm Island as punishment.’

Cruelly, voting was made compulsory for the Tribal Original Peoples in 1983, forcing them to choose a master from a predetermined list of white men who were clearly unaware and uneducated in the ways of their historical Tribal predecessors or the balance of the living environment,  leaving them further enslaved to the occupying regime, and the will of the most ignorant of men.
The Australian government has not evolved since these horrendous crimes committed by our British forefathers and that is because it operates on the same system; money before people.
Children are still being taken from their parents, people are still held in prisons for victimless ‘crimes’, and governments continue to pass legislation, acts and statutes that continually disadvantage those most vulnerable; without lawful authority.
The ‘justice’ system is a farce based on trickery and implied consent, deviously concealing the fact that the ‘Crown’ have discontinued our inalienable right as people to be recognised as ‘Natural Humans’ and are now, in the narrow sight of the ‘Crown’, only considered to be ‘legal persons’, virtual corporations that have no human rights, via our ‘birth certificates’, or ‘bondage certificates’.
‘Star Chambers’, once abolished due to the unjust process, are employed today by the ‘Crown’ and it’s henchmen and considered by these criminals as ‘justice’.
The electoral procedure employed is a legal trap by a corporation to continue the slavery, an implied agreement, without full disclosure, based on unlawful legislation making it an offence payable to not agree to be governed.
Local governments have no authority, the Australian people choosing to not allow them authority, via referenda, twice, and yet if council rates are not paid home owners have their homes taken from them by force by government agents.
The Australian government has supported and financed terrorism plots against many countries, including Iraq and Syria, colluding with the British and US governments, killing and maiming many thousands.  ‘Income tax’ is demanded with the threat of incarceration, property acquisition, violence and financial hardship, forcing innocent Australian citizens to pay for governmental crimes.
Slavery, murder, child abuse, violence and usury is rife in Australia’s political history, and it flourishes under government legislation today. Clearly, the sole reason for the assumed authority of the Australian government, is the legalisation of it’s own crimes and it’s monopoly on weapons.


Without contracts, agreements and consent we are left with thuggery

The foundation of legal relations is a ‘contract’, an agreement of the parties. In order for an agreement to be a contract (or a variation of an existing contract) it must be supported by consideration and full disclosure; (the “whole truth” about any matter which the other party should know in deciding to contract). The agreement must also be sufficiently certain and complete to be enforced, and the parties must have intended their agreement to be a contract. The absence of any of these elements will signify either that there is, in law, no agreement or that the agreement is not enforceable as a contract.

The most important decision a person could make is whether or not, he or she would employ the services of someone to ‘take care of their affairs’, to represent them or to govern them. As proof of this fact I would like to point out that there are contractual agreements in law that are sighted and witnessed regarding Enduring Power of Attorney agreements and similar positions of ‘representation’, such as an Executor.  The fact that the Australian government, it’s agencies and sub-corporations do not have written consent from individuals and Peoples to govern them means there is no contract, no proof at all of authority, which is why ‘judges’ and ‘magistrates’ run out of court room when asked for their proof of authority.

It is every natural human being’s right to agree or not to agree to such contracts, and without consent from Australians as individuals there cannot be a government who claims to govern all. Decisions can not be made for us by governments that did not have our consent via written or verbal contract to begin with, and most certainly can not be lawfully enforced through property acquisition, violence or imprisonment.

I again quote Justice Michael Kirby; “ may be said that they, the people, are the ultimate source of legitimacy of all law in Australia.”  Justice Kirby was correct, the law must come from the people, for the benefit of the people and their home, and if the people, individually do not wish to contract there is no lawful basis for governance or the legislation thereof.

Clearly, the Original Tribal Peoples did not consent to a British governance, they did not, in fact, consent to be governed at all.  Our Tribal Peoples are victims of horrendous crimes, the crimes of the Crown corporation and it’s agents, historically and presently.

As Australians we must be vigilant not to allow invasion, genocide and slavery to be considered a legitimate basis of governance lest we further, as a nation, become victims of these draconian beliefs. We must acknowledge and protect the individual’s natural born rights, choices and freedoms and investigate the crimes of those who would be traitors to the Australian Peoples, and enemies of the Original Tribes.

Not only is it unlawful for a corporation, even if it is masquerading as a government, to make decisions for people without their written consent, especially those that have had their lands, culture and families taken from them by that same corporation, but it is unjust!
I reject the ‘Crown’s’ corporation/s, it’s agents and agencies’ assumption of authority over me.
I reject their claim of authority to makes laws, acts and statues that deprive myself, and others of what are inalienable rights.
I reject it’s titles, I reject it’s acts of terrorism against the Australian people and it’s victims abroad.
I will not condone the ‘Crown’s’ crimes against humanity, and I will not serve the enemy of my People.
I reject the constitution as I did not sign a contract giving the Australian constitution authority foregoing my inalienable rights.
I will not vote for a slave master, a lord or a ‘queen’.
I reject the ‘Crowns’ claim of ownership over Australia, it’s land, it’s assets and it’s People, and assert that the ‘Crown’ is a gang of thieves and tyrants, now and historically, unlawfully using our birth certificates as certificates of ownership.
The Original Tribal Australians are a free people, they are the guardians of this land. They left no gaping holes in this land, did not poison waterways and left no ‘carbon footprints’. White man could have learned so much, but chose, rather, to live in constant feud and ignorance. The most important aspect of our life here on this planet is compassion, but the ‘Crown’ is a psychotic Corporation that will not stop until it devours all.

The ‘Crown’s’ illegitimacy has been unveiled, and with it all of it’s crimes. Will the government prosecute that which it swears allegiance to? Of course not, the ‘Crown’ is it’s master, the ‘Crown’ is the government, so these most horrendous crimes go, not only unpunished to this day, but celebrated by ignorant politicians and ‘blind’ servants of the ‘Crown’.
With regard to the compulsory inclusion of Original Tribal Australians in the ‘constitution’; in the absence of a lawfully binding contract from every individual Natural human, it must be known that there is no implied consent, there is simply ”no contract”. Anything less than consent is an act of war.

Save the Planet, Smash the system!